Research and evidence needs for decarbonisation in the built environment: A UK case study

Skea, J (2012) Research and evidence needs for decarbonisation in the built environment: A UK case study. Building Research & Information, 40(4), pp. 432-445. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The research and evaluation needs to support radical decarbonisation in the built environment are examined for the UK. Since buildings account for approximately 40% of UK energy demand, energy use in buildings will need to be transformed if ambitious climate policy objectives are to be met. In the context of wider energy system change, the needs are for greater efficiency, greater use of electric technologies such as heat pumps as electricity become cleaner, and the use of renewable heat such as biomass. At the same time, the introduction of smart technology offers new opportunities to measure and evaluate changes in demand patterns and the impact of policy interventions. The paper notes that the technical and social dimensions of radical decarbonisation are intimately intertwined. Therefore, social and economic research has a vital role to play in supporting the design and implementation of effective policy, taking advantage of new data-collection opportunities. Drawing on lessons from other policy domains, the paper explores the role that rigorous policy evaluation techniques, little used in the energy domain, could play. It identifies a range of concerns, relating to the political sphere, policy delivery and consumer acceptance, that would need to be addressed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; climate change; energy; energy efficiency; policy measures; renewable heat; research agenda; research and evaluation
Index terms: case study, energy demand, energy efficiency, research agenda, efficiency, policy evaluation, drawing, evidence, heat pump, policy measure, built environment, energy system, climate change, dimension, energy use, climate policy, implementation
Subjects: climate science, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, policy studies, energy systems, contractual arrangements, health monitoring assessment and metrics, sustainability and energy, technical documentation, climate policy, performance management, infrastructure and transport systems, research management
Topics: Quality Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Governance, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here