Zari, M P (2012) Ecosystem services analysis for the design of regenerative built environments. Building Research & Information, 40(1), pp. 54-64. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Neutral environmental outcomes in terms of energy use, carbon emissions, waste generation or water use are worthy but difficult targets in architectural and urban design. However, the built environment may need to go beyond efforts simply to limit negative environmental outcomes and instead aim for net positive environmental benefits. This implies that the built environment would need to contribute more than it consumes while simultaneously remediating past and current environmental damage. Such development could be termed regenerative. The potential for understanding and then mimicking ecosystem services is explored for setting goals for regenerative developments, designing them and measuring their successes or failures as they evolve over time. Key leverage points are identified where the systems of the built environment may be changed in order to move towards a regenerative urban environment. Analysing the urban built environment from the perspective of how ecosystems function could be a significant step towards the creation of a built environment where positive integration with, and restoration of, local ecosystems may be realized.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | biomimicry; built environment; ecology; ecosystem services; environmental benefits; place; regenerative design; urban design |
| Index terms: | ecosystem services, waste generation, ecology, biomimetic, regenerative design, urban design, carbon emission, energy use, restoration, urban environment, integration, built environment |
| Subjects: | urban design, renovation and retrofit, biodiversity, infrastructure and transport systems, organizational analysis, environmental impact, urban sustainability, climate science, design theory, energy systems, environmental science, sustainability and energy |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here