Ackerly, K and Brager, G (2013) Window signalling systems: Control strategies and occupant behaviour. Building Research & Information, 41(3), pp. 342-360. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Signalling systems that tell building occupants when to open and close windows have become a popular strategy for balancing the comfort benefits of manual windows with the efficiency benefits of automation in mixed-mode buildings. Data from surveys, interviews and site observations in 16 US buildings reveal a diversity of design objectives, control sequences and circumstances to anticipate when designing buildings with window signalling systems. The signals had the strongest influence on occupants- use of windows when they were visible, the logic behind the controls algorithms was clearly understood, and they were seen as an informational device linked to an explicit internal policy that has to do with efficient and comfortable building operation. Lower levels of participation occurred when occupants tend not to pay attention to their windows, or the signals, unless they are uncomfortable, at which point it matters little what the signals indicate. However, occupants who do discover value in the signals are more likely to be more satisfied with their personal control. Occupants- reasons for opening windows may include the desire for fresh air or air movement, which is as important to them as temperature adjustment, but admittedly difficult to program into the controls- algorithms.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive behaviour; agency; feedback; mixed-mode; natural ventilation; occupant satisfaction; personal control; windows |
| Index terms: | agency, automation, building operation, air movement, occupant behaviour, window, program, comfort, natural ventilation, occupant satisfaction, personal control, strategy, adaptive behaviour, survey, interview, efficiency |
| Subjects: | human factors, user-centered design, data collection methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, sociology, occupational health and safety management, behavioral psychology, environmental engineering, software systems, performance management, management, architectural elements, automation and robotics |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here