Aho, I (2013) Value-added business models: Linking professionalism and delivery of sustainability. Building Research & Information, 41(1), pp. 110-114. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The property and construction industry's lack of progress towards sustainability is sometimes blamed on corporate short-sightedness and short-term profit-seeking. What is unfortunately not often taken into account is what constitutes an appropriate business model. The industry faces a paradox: long-term sustainability of this sector requires major changes to current practices, but in order to finance the necessary investment to change, short-term profits are required. Inherent structural characteristics of the industry inhibit this desired transformation, especially as industry structures currently do not reward those responsible for a building's added-value or performance. A business model is needed which genuinely relates price and earnings to the actual performance delivered to the customer and society. This dilemma is considered from the points of view of businesses and individual professionals. Research into sustainability of buildings should be underpinned by innovation in business models that: (1) provide business incentives for long-term service levels and performance of actual facilities; (2) enable and empower professionals within the businesses to act according to long-term goals; and (3) provide sufficient short-term returns for financing the two other objectives.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | business culture; business models; construction industry; performance-based building; professionalism; supply chain; sustainable building; value |
| Index terms: | business model, sustainable building, paradox, performance-based, financing, professionalism, construction industry, society, business culture, profit, transformation, face |
| Subjects: | business, psychology, economic analysis, social theory and frameworks, performance measurement, sustainable construction, professional development, sociology, industry analysis, communities and social development |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Quality Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here