New professionalism: The post-industrial context

Bachman, L R (2013) New professionalism: The post-industrial context. Building Research & Information, 41(6), pp. 752-760. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Definitions and perceptions of professionalism are continually challenged and transformed by public need, government interaction and institutional organizations. When the goals of those three entities are focused on near-term results, this poses a significant threat to the integrity, value and relevance of professional services. When the individual and corporate professional’s profit margin, corporate shareholder responsibility and news media sensationalism are factored in, this short-termism dynamic is greatly magnified. Built environment professions are seen as particularly vulnerable to this threat, given that investments in buildings and infrastructure have long-life and high-performance service expectations. This commentary responds to the Building Research & Information special issue entitled 'New Professionalism' (2013, volume 40, number 1) and situates the predicament of built environment professionals within an emerging historical transition: that of the post-industrial information society with its characteristic knowledge workers and cybernetic bases of production. Long-term virtues of the built environment mission such as sustainability, public good and evidence-based design are shown to be reflections of the transition from industrial era short-termism to post-industrial systemic foresight. This commentary supplements the special issue papers with a discussion on the broader academy’s potential role in breaking the stranglehold of contemporary short-termism in the built environment professions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; education; professionalism; public institutions; public interest; universities
Index terms: society, professionalism, public interest, public good, integrity, evidence-based design, interaction, building research, built environment, profit, media, reflection, professional service, profession
Subjects: political science, communities and social development, behavioral psychology, design methods, organization, professional development, infrastructure and transport systems, health safety and environment, research management, institututions, economic analysis, sociology
Topics: Roles and Professions, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Information Management, Governance, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here