Cole, R J and Valdebenito, M J (2013) The importation of building environmental certification systems: International usages of BREEAM and LEED. Building Research & Information, 41(6), pp. 662-676. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
A proliferation of the development of building environmental assessment methods has occurred for application within many individual countries' domestic markets. However, the demand for 'brand recognition' in a global market, the desire for international standards and the motivation of the owners of some systems to expand the adoption of their assessment systems abroad are among many of the forces driving toward the increased international use of the two most established methods: BREEAM and LEED. Drawing on published databases of projects assessed by these two systems, an examination is presented of their international use, with particular attention paid to the relationship between their use and the existence of national systems developed in the countries of application. A more detailed analysis of the types of projects that have been assessed is provided using data from six specific countries with qualitatively different cultural, economic and environmental contexts and some of which that have national assessment systems: Chile, Colombia, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Arab Emirates. The influence of national Green Building Councils in promoting environmental assessments is also considered.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | branding; breeam; building assessment systems; certification systems; construction markets; environmental assessment; globalization; LEED |
| Index terms: | construction market, United Arab Emirates, certification, Netherlands, environmental assessment, database, drawing, green building, owner, globalization, markets, environmental certification, Colombia, motivation, building environmental assessment, Czech Republic, Sweden, Chile, BREEAM accreditation, building assessment |
| Subjects: | data management, design practice, sustainability assessment, sociology, economic factors, asset management, environmental policy, environmental impact, market analysis, administrative processes, technical documentation, economic analysis, Geography, psychology |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Sustainability, Human Resources, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Contract Administration, Geographical Context, Digital Applications, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here