City futures: Exploring urban retrofit and sustainable transitions

Eames, M; Dixon, T; May, T and Hunt, M (2013) City futures: Exploring urban retrofit and sustainable transitions. Building Research & Information, 41(5), pp. 504-516. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Cities are responsible for up to 70% of global carbon emissions and 75% of global energy consumption. By 2050 it is estimated that 70% of the world's population will live in cities. The critical challenge for contemporary urbanism, therefore, is to understand how to develop the knowledge, capacity and capability for public agencies, the private sector and multiple users in city-regions (i.e. the city and its wider hinterland) to re-engineer systemically their built environment and urban infrastructure in response to climate change and resource constraints. To inform transitions to urban sustainability, key stakeholders' perceptions were sought though a participatory backcasting and scenario foresight process in order to illuminate challenging but realistic socio-technical scenarios for the systemic retrofit of core UK city-regions. The challenge of conceptualizing complex urban transitions is explored across multiple socio-technical regimes (housing, non-domestic buildings, urban infrastructure), scales (building, neighbourhood, city-region), and domains (energy, water, use of resources) within a participatory process. The development of three archetypal guiding visions of retrofit city-regional futures developed through this process are discussed, along with the contribution that such foresight processes might play in opening up the governance and strategic navigation of urban sustainability.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptation; cities; climate change; retrofit; sustainability; transitions; urban; visions
Index terms: agency, energy consumption, private sector, climate change, socio-technical regime, governance, urban infrastructure, urbanism, housing, built environment, resource constraint, engineer, carbon emission, socio-technical, adaptation, population, non-domestic building
Subjects: cities and urban places, user focus, energy systems, business, research methods, operations management, profession, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems, construction type, demography, industry analysis, climate science
Topics: Governance, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here