Foulds, C; Powell, J and Seyfan, G (2013) Investigating the performance of everyday domestic practices using building monitoring. Building Research & Information, 41(6), pp. 622-636. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The monitoring of buildings can enhance the understanding of everyday life, yet it has sparsely been used in social practices research. Monitoring usually provides context (e.g. differences in performing practices) for more prominent qualitative enquiry. The potential of building monitoring is investigated for studying the performance of domestic practices. A Passivhaus development is examined for its applicability. Monitoring data include temperature, humidity, CO2 and electricity sub-metering. These data provide a good basis for investigating how technologies relate to the other elements (influences) of practice in shaping everyday life. The benefits and limitations of integrating monitoring with qualitative data are considered (e.g. residents' enthusiasm for co-investigating monitoring data; monitoring data having insufficient richness without accompanying qualitative data). Monitoring and qualitative data are shown to be complementary, and capable of producing insights beyond those of non-integrated approaches. Building monitoring can be further utilized in researching practices, particularly when considering the everyday implications of technological changes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; consumption practices; housing; low-carbon housing; monitoring; occupant behaviour; occupant surveys; passivhaus; social practice theory |
| Index terms: | building monitoring, social practice, built environment, technological change, monitoring, housing, occupant behaviour, consumption, Passivhaus, humidity, social practice theory, integrated approach, occupant survey, everyday life |
| Subjects: | social theory, energy efficiency, theoretical framing, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, asset management, consumer economics, innovation studies, climate science, health behaviours and lifestyles, control systems, data collection methods, construction type, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Urban Studies, Site Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here