Fuerst, F; Van De Wetering, J and Wyatt, P (2013) Is intrinsic energy efficiency reflected in the pricing of office leases? Building Research & Information, 41(4), pp. 373-383. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
This paper investigates whether the intrinsic energy efficiency rating of an office building has a significant impact on its rental value. A sample of 817 transactions for offices with Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) in the UK is used to assess whether a pricing differential can be identified, depending on the energy rating. While previous analyses of this topic have typically relied on appraisal-based and/or asking rent data, the dataset used in this research contains actual contract rents as well as information on lease terms. The results indicate a significant rental premium for energy-efficient buildings. However, it is found that this premium appears to be mainly driven by the youngest cohort of state-of-the-art energy-efficient buildings. The results also show that tenants of more energy-efficient buildings tend to pay a lower service charge, but this link appears to be rather weak and limited to newer buildings. Hence, it is argued that the information contained in the EPC is still not fully taken into account in the UK commercial property market with the possible exception of both the highest and the lowest EPC ratings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | commercial offices; eco-labelling; energy efficiency; energy performance certificate; hedonic modelling; rental premium; rental values |
| Index terms: | energy performance certificate, energy-efficient building, office building, tenant, appraisal, commercial office, lease, state of the art, commercial property, energy efficiency, dataset, pricing, modelling |
| Subjects: | construction type, sustainability and energy, land economics, practitioner, research dissemination and communication, sustainable design, economic analysis, analytical methods, data management, energy systems, factor and component analysis |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here