Professionalism and ethics in a changing economy

Hill, S; Lorenz, D; Dent, P and Lützkendorf, T (2013) Professionalism and ethics in a changing economy. Building Research & Information, 41(1), pp. 8-27. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Professional responsibilities in a complex and contested work environment are constantly being reshaped by a changing economic, environmental and social context. Responsibility and accountability have become more diffuse, and they reside with a wider group including professionals and professional organizations. The codes, charters and laws of several built environment professional organizations in the United Kingdom and Germany are examined for ethical principles and guidance. The allocation of responsibility for acting in the public interest rests with both the individual professional and the professional organizations, but many professionals experience an ethical void due to little guidance from their institutions. To address this problem, an ethical framework is constructed for professionals, allowing ethical issues to be considered in a structured, practical way. Consideration is also given to how to foster conditions for professionals to take personal responsibility for ethical behaviour, including the idea of personal responsibility for the Other. An overarching concept of civic professionalism can guide professional behaviour. A set of guiding ethical principles for professional practice can stimulate both individual professionals and their professional organizations to fulfil this key role better, as well as challenging the latter to fulfil their leadership role and responsibilities in professional practice and civic society.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: accountability; civic; ethics; leadership; professionalism; public interest; responsibility; values
Index terms: public interest, professional practice, professionalism, society, ethical behaviour, Germany, leadership role, work environment, built environment, United Kingdom, accountability, ethics
Subjects: ethical practice, Geography, leadership, infrastructure and transport systems, professional development, liability law, ethical issues, management, political science, communities and social development
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Human Resources, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Information Management, Governance
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here