Holmes, S H and Reinhart, C F (2013) Assessing future climate change and energy price scenarios: Institutional building investment. Building Research & Information, 41(2), pp. 209-222. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
As global temperatures may increase due to climate change, so would energy use for building heating and cooling. Additionally, energy prices fluctuate in relation to climate change socio-economic impacts and related policies, which in turn further influence future building operational costs. A new method is presented to consider climate change and future energy price scenarios for institutional building owners to compare investment options for various energy conservation measures related to heating and cooling. Heating and cooling energy use are predicted for office buildings in Boston (Massachusetts) and Phoenix (Arizona) using a range of different climate change and energy price scenarios. The results allow building owners (1) to understand building performance under a spectrum of possible futures, and (2) to determine the associated risk ranges present when choosing between design solutions. For the example buildings, it is shown that a financial payback of 15 years is possible for an advanced retrofitting strategy in Phoenix; this compares favourably with the 18-year payback calculated while ignoring climate change. Cumulative energy costs over 70 years and peak loads by 2050 are predicted to more than double for the Phoenix baseline model, whereas the advanced design all but eliminates that cost increase.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptation; building economics; building performance; building retrofits; climate change; energy modelling; real options; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | energy modelling, energy cost, owner, building performance, strategy, socio-economic impact, peak load, adaptation, office building, cost increase, building economics, payback, energy use, real option, energy conservation, option, retrofitting, institutional building, climate change |
| Subjects: | economics, renovation and retrofit, management, decision analysis, sociology, cost management, quality assurance, user focus, construction type, climate science, economic and policy analysis, sustainability and energy, economic analysis, energy systems |
| Topics: | Site Management, Design Practice, Quality Management, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here