Hughes, M; Palmer, J; Cheng, V and Shipworth, D (2013) Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of england's housing energy model. Building Research & Information, 41(2), pp. 156-167. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
SAP/BREDEM-based models are commonly used for estimating national domestic energy consumption and for assessing the energy and environmental impacts of changes in the housing stock. However, policy-makers should recognize that such models are subject to multiple potential sources of uncertainty. A one-at-a-time sensitivity analysis is undertaken on the Cambridge Housing Model, a SAP 2009 model for estimating total domestic energy consumption in England and the UK. The analysis identifies several parameters to which the model is particularly sensitive, determines that the response to variations in individual parameters is typically non-linear, and concludes that changes to multiple parameters are not additive. A Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis is then undertaken to provide an indication of the impact of multiple uncertainties on model outputs. A concept map is developed to outline a number of potential sources of uncertainty, and in the absence of reliable information expert judgement is used to describe these uncertainties. Outputs suggest that any single estimate of total consumption may be subject to considerable inaccuracy compared with actual use. Similar levels of uncertainty and inaccuracy are likely for any SAP/BREDEM-based national domestic energy model, such as the models underpinning the Green Deal.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | domestic energy; energy model; household energy; housing stock; sensitivity analysis; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | green deal, England, energy consumption, household, estimating, housing stock, environmental impact, energy model, sensitivity analysis, concept map, consumption, estimate, housing, uncertainty analysis, variation, expert judgement |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, environmental impact, industry analysis, consumer economics, sustainability assessment, decision analysis, financial and cost management, contractual condition, construction type, Geography, demography, energy systems, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Sustainability, Risk Management, Contract Administration, Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here