Jones, P; Lannon, S and Patterson, J (2013) Retrofitting existing housing: How far, how much? Building Research & Information, 41(5), pp. 532-550. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The significance of retrofitting the existing housing stock is considered for the policy commitment of delivering an 80% CO2 emission reduction by 2050. Background issues of energy, legislation, potential and actual CO 2 savings, socio-economics (payback, fuel poverty, health impacts, employment stimulus, etc.) are discussed. Different potential retrofit strategies for the housing stock are presented. Three large-scale housing retrofit programmes in Wales, UK, are analysed for energy savings (using the Energy and Environmental Prediction Model), CO2 reduction and costs. Two whole house retrofit projects in Wales are also assessed, one of which has been the subject of long-term monitoring. Data are compared on a range of retrofit options: different strategies (elemental, multiple and whole-house measures), costs, actual CO2 reductions and associated benefits. The findings indicate that as the cost of measures rise in relation to the predicted savings, reasonable paybacks will be difficult to achieve, particularly for finance packages such as the Green Deal. There are funding opportunities for installing shallow elemental measures to reduce CO2 emissions by 10-30%. However, the large-scale financing of deep (60-80% reductions) whole-house packages of measures is not currently available and does not pay back.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building stock; energy; housing; low carbon; public policy; refurbishment; retrofit |
| Index terms: | payback, energy-saving, long-term monitoring, funding, retrofitting, housing, retrofit strategy, financing, option, Wales, public policy, package, CO2 emissions, fuel poverty, legislation, programme, green deal, prediction model, low carbon, savings, strategy, commitment, housing stock, employment, building stock |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, prediction and forecasting, strategic project management, energy systems, legal systems, contractual arrangements, public policy, psychology, climate science, air quality, construction type, industry analysis, decision analysis, asset management, project controls, Geography, renovation and retrofit, sustainability assessment, management |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Risk Management, Governance, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Procurement, Legal Issues, Human Resources, Organizational Design, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here