Lomas, K J and Kane, T (2013) Summertime temperatures and thermal comfort in UK homes. Building Research & Information, 41(3), pp. 259-280. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Internal summertime temperatures measured in 268 homes in Leicester, UK, are reported. The hourly data were collected from living rooms and bedrooms during the summer of 2009. Some household interviews were conducted. The sample of homes was statistically representative of the socio-technical characteristics of the city-s housing stock. The data provide insight into the influence of house construction, energy system usage, and occupant characteristics on the incidence of elevated temperatures and thermal discomfort. The warmest homes were amongst the 13% that were heated. Significantly more of these had occupants aged over 70 years who are particularly vulnerable to high temperatures. The national heatwave plan might usefully caution against summertime heating. Temperatures in the 230 free-running homes were analysed using both static criteria and criteria associated with the BSEN15251 adaptive thermal comfort model. These indicated that flats tended to be significantly warmer than other house types. Solid wall homes and detached houses tended to be significantly cooler. It is argued that adaptive criteria provide a valuable and credible framework for assessing internal temperatures in free-running UK homes. However, the temperatures in the Leicester homes were much lower than anticipated by the BSEN15251 model. Numerous possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptation; climate change; heat stress; heatwave; houses; overheating; summer; temperature measurement; thermal comfort; UK |
| Index terms: | house construction, heat stress, socio-technical, household, summer, discomfort, bedroom, climate change, heatwave, overheating, energy system, high temperature, adaptation, interview, temperature measurement, housing stock, thermal comfort |
| Subjects: | construction type, research methods, demography, environmental engineering, data collection methods, health risk and incident analysis, climate science, analytical methods, thermal systems, environmental health, industry analysis, energy systems, user focus, architectural elements |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here