The influence of different cooling techniques and gender on thermal perception

Schellen, L; Loomans, M; De Wit, M and Van Marken Lichtenbelt, W (2013) The influence of different cooling techniques and gender on thermal perception. Building Research & Information, 41(3), pp. 330-341. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The use of low exergy cooling concepts in the built environment can reduce the reliance upon high-quality energy sources. However, the application of such cooling systems can result in whole-body and local discomfort of the occupants. The differences in thermal perception between genders are studied to understand how convective and radiant cooling may impact upon comfort. Physiological and thermal sensation data indicate significant differences between the different experimental cases for each gender. For the prediction of thermal sensation and thermal comfort under non-uniform conditions, the operative temperature only is not sufficient. Combined local factors play an important role in the comfort assessment. For females, the local sensations and skin temperatures of the extremities have a significant influence on whole-body thermal sensation and are therefore important to consider under non-uniform environmental conditions. The results show that existing thermal comfort standards are not suitable for application under non-uniform thermal environments for the assessment of thermal comfort. Local effects, as local skin temperatures, play an important role in the whole-body thermal assessment. Therefore, the operative temperature alone is insufficient for the assessment of thermal comfort.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cooling; gender; non-uniform thermal environments; physiology; thermal comfort; thermal sensation
Index terms: thermal perception, comfort, local discomfort, environmental conditions, sensation, thermal environment, skin temperature, cooling system, built environment, energy source, operative, thermal comfort, thermal sensation
Subjects: infrastructure and transport systems, occupational health and safety management, environmental engineering, practitioner, human factors and perception, building performance, energy systems, mechanical systems, environmental science, environmental health
Topics: Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here