Professionalism in China's building sector: An economic governance perspective

Sha, K (2013) Professionalism in China's building sector: An economic governance perspective. Building Research & Information, 41(6), pp. 742-751. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

As the third force beside markets and governments, professionalism emerged to protect the interests of civil society, and it has played a unique role in the building sector. By conceptualizing professionalism as a community-based governance structure, an economic governance perspective is adopted to examine professionalism in China's building sector. The development of professionalism in China's building sector is reviewed, and both its achievements and its weaknesses are assessed. Root-cause analysis reveals that the primary impediment to building professionalism is the imbalanced relationship between markets, governments and professionals. It is argued that the success of professionalism in China's building sector is dependent ultimately on whether the government can change its overly dominant role in the economy. To address the concern of creating an independent, vibrant professional culture that contributes to the long-term public interest, the following are recommended: separating professional associations and relevant bodies from government agencies completely; improving the administrative system for both practice qualification and market access; and increasing the proportion of non-government investments to change the imbalanced relationship between professionals and public clients.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; China; construction industry; governance; integrity; professionalism; uncertainty
Index terms: integrity, public interest, governance, government agency, qualification, community-based, public client, China, construction industry, professionalism, markets, built environment, civil society
Subjects: political science, communities and social development, administrative law, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, professional development, health safety and environment, Geography, educational resources, economic analysis, business
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Governance, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Education, Urban Studies, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here