Focusing on best value from a source selection perspective

Kumaraswamy Associate Professor, M; Kong, H and Xue Qing Doctoral, Z (2004) Focusing on best value from a source selection perspective. Construction Economics and Building, 4(1), pp. 21-34. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

The emerging focus on "best value" in construction projects entails several crucial and complex decision-making tasks for appropriate selection of capable contractors and consultants. In many ways and thus could be correspondingly achieved at different levels. Although traditional "price based" selection approaches are still preferred on various grounds such as simplicity and/or public accountability, they may well result in some "false economy" or missed opportunities for producing a better value. Furthermore, the lower significance of price as compared to the higher risk transference in project delivery methods such as Design-Build and Build-Operate-Transfer type arrangements render the purely "price based" approaches even less useful. Therefore a structured value focused selection approach is considered as beneficial for meeting the client's goals and projct-specific needs. This paper presents discussions on some useful approaches to best value conceptualizations in "Source selection" perspectives, e.g. starting with the "right" selection of competent constructors in Design-Bid-Build type projects. Furthermore, a conceptualized basic framework for best value selection is also presented.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: benchmarking; best value; construction; contractor selection; procurement
Index terms: build-operate-transfer, best value, construction project, contractor selection, decision-making, accountability, design-bid-build, benchmarking, project delivery
Subjects: bidding, contractual arrangements, project delivery, liability law, decision analysis, production management, performance measurement, tendering
Topics: Project Management, Procurement, Risk Management, Quality Management, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here