Assessing impacts of summertime overheating: Some adaptation strategies

Tillson, A A; Oreszczyn, T and Palmer, J (2013) Assessing impacts of summertime overheating: Some adaptation strategies. Building Research & Information, 41(6), pp. 652-661. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The UK is predicted to experience warmer summers in the future, but the domestic building stock in England was not designed to cope with this change. The Standard Assessment Procedure (SAP) 2009 is used to assess the current state of the English building stock in terms of its vulnerability to overheating. The English Housing Survey 2009 provided data for 16 150 dwellings which are weighted to represent the housing stock. SAP predicts 82% of dwellings are currently at 'slight' risk of overheating and 41% at medium to high risk. If summer temperatures become 1.4°C warmer, then 99% of properties are predicted to have a medium to high risk of overheating. Several potential adaptations to the housing stock were considered to reduce overheating. Although ventilation strategies had the largest positive effect, the use of solar shading and shutters which allow secure ventilation could reduce vulnerability to overheating in the current climate. In a warmer climate, although some dwellings would still be at slight risk, the results suggest that solar shading strategies could reduce the percentage of those at medium to high risk to 6%. Future energy efficiency programmes will need to include adaptation measures to prevent overheating.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptation; building stock; climate change; housing; overheating; ventilation; vulnerability
Index terms: survey, adaptation, domestic building, ventilation, programme, building stock, housing stock, overheating, strategy, energy efficiency, England, climate change, housing, shading, summer, vulnerability
Subjects: sustainability and energy, climate science, data collection methods, construction type, air quality, user focus, industry analysis, environmental hazards, thermal systems, project controls, asset management, Geography, management, building design
Topics: Time Control, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here