Todd, J A; Pyke, C and Tufts, R (2013) Implications of trends in LEED usage: Rating system design and market transformation. Building Research & Information, 41(4), pp. 384-400. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Green building rating systems serve multiple functions: they define the attributes of green buildings, provide tools for environmental assessment and include specific interventions intended to promote market transformation. These goals are often complementary, but can also create tensions in the design and application of rating systems. Recent patterns and trends are considered for projects certified using LEED-NC and LEED-EBOM (new construction and existing buildings, respectively) rating systems. New data are presented on (1) patterns and trends in on-going market transformation (credit achievement, levels of certification and types, geographic distribution of project, etc.) and (2) the design and revision of the LEED rating system based on broad patterns of engagement and the achievement of individual credits. The data indicate strong regional and temporal variation in green building activity. The flexibility of LEED has allowed a diversity of credit achievement patterns. Information on these market-based patterns and trends can be used to balance the need for market engagement with the mission to raise standards over time. Patterns and trends for different locations can stimulate discussion of different markets and the most effective approaches for their transformation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building assessment systems; construction markets; environmental assessment; green building; LEED; market transformation; rating system design; real estate markets; trends |
| Index terms: | environmental assessment, construction market, markets, market transformation, green building, temporal variation, real estate, transformation, certification, building assessment |
| Subjects: | administrative processes, asset management, project controls, market analysis, design practice, economic analysis, real estate economics, economic and policy analysis, environmental impact, business |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Design Practice, Contract Administration, Time Control, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here