Socio-technical issues in dwelling retrofit

Tweed, C (2013) Socio-technical issues in dwelling retrofit. Building Research & Information, 41(5), pp. 551-562. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Although a wide range of technical solutions exist to reduce energy consumption and CO2 emissions, these may not produce the predicted savings if occupants operate the refurbished dwelling in unexpected ways, resulting in a performance gap. Retrofit can be approached as a set of socio-technical issues. Social practice theory is the dominant approach in socio-technical studies of energy in the home. However, other ways can investigate how people engage with and experience their home environments, including their interaction with energy technologies. This can extend the reach of socio-technical studies to encompass personal experience of reconfigured homes within the broader socio-cultural context. Methodologies from phenomenology and ecological psychology used in architecture and philosophy of technology - principally the concepts of breakdown and affordance - can examine occupants' experience of a retrofitted environment. An energy retrofit of an occupied dwelling is used to illustrate how such methods can provide insights into occupants' experience of and responses to refurbishment. It is suggested that householders' energy and comfort concerns emerge and recede alongside other concerns in both time and space as they adjust to their reconfigured home. Changing affordances after retrofit can influence how people use dwelling space in ways that have energy consumption consequences.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: affordances; buildings; energy demand; phenomenology; retrofit; socio-technical issues
Index terms: socio-technical, energy demand, social practice theory, CO2 emissions, savings, philosophy, comfort, energy consumption, performance gap, methodology, phenomenology, energy technology, psychology, affordance, interaction
Subjects: methods and analysis, theoretical framing, performance management, research methods, philosophical studies, behavioral psychology, occupational health and safety management, air quality, energy systems, innovation and technology management, economic analysis
Topics: Quality Management, Design Practice, Sustainability, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here