Williams, K; Gupta, R; Hopkins, D; Gregg, M; Payne, C; Joynt, J L R; Smith, I and Bates-Brkljac, N (2013) Retrofitting England's suburbs to adapt to climate change. Building Research & Information, 41(5), pp. 517-531. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The majority of the English population lives in suburbs and this is where the impacts of climate change will significantly affect people's domestic lives: heat stress, respiratory problems, flooding, drought, deterioration of green spaces and damage from storms. A recognized need exists to adapt suburbs (homes, gardens and public space) physically to mitigate against further climate change and to adapt to inevitable weather patterns. A number of potential adaptation options, addressing different risks, are identified and tested using a range of methods, including modelling, and workshops with residents and professional and institutional stakeholders. The best solutions are those that reduce the climate risk within the context of local adaptive capacity. Solutions are effective, acceptable and feasible given the type of suburb; its location; microclimate; housing type; the climate risk it faces; the socio-economic composition of its residents and their attitudes; resources; and governance conditions. It is essential to consider both the totality of the suburban environment and the combined effects of mitigation and adaptation measures. However, the biggest challenge is implementation which entails a better understanding of the problem by a range of stakeholders, a more supportive policy context, more resources, and clearer responsibilities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptation; built environment; climate change; neighbourhood; overheating; planning policy; retrofit; suburbs |
| Index terms: | overheating, face, adaptive capacity, flooding, adaptation, deterioration, England, governance, workshop, implementation, modelling, drought, planning policy, climate risk, option, heat stress, climate change, retrofitting, housing, weather, microclimate, public space, population, mitigation, built environment |
| Subjects: | construction type, user focus, business, air quality, climate science, psychology, public policy, contractual arrangements, material degradation and durability, analytical methods, renovation and retrofit, Geography, urban design and public space, urban design, financial risk, demography, decision analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, thermal systems, environmental hazards, environmental health |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Sustainability, Governance, Construction Technology, Procurement, Risk Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here