Anderies, J M (2014) Embedding built environments in social-ecological systems: Resilience-based design principles. Building Research & Information, 42(2), pp. 130-142. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Globalization, the process by which local settlements and ecosystems are becoming linked in a global network, presents policy scientists and planners with difficult design challenges. Coping with either natural or built environments in isolation is extremely challenging in its own right (e.g. built environments at different scales: a single building, a collection of buildings, a neighbourhood or a city are in themselves very complex). In the Anthropocene era, where human activities shape the planetary system in which built and natural environments are becoming more tightly linked across scales, these complex systems need to be considered as elements in a global network, i.e. as a coupled social-ecological system (SES) at the global scale. In the context of this spiralling complexity, multi-scale and multilevel processes become more important and design/management problems become extraordinarily difficult. Preliminary ideas are explored for how research on this multilevel design problem might proceed. Specifically, based on combining insights from a collection of theories and models based on resilience and robustness concepts, the basic elements of a new approach are presented that recognizes the importance of self-organizing processes at multiple scales and emphasizes the use of feedbacks to link these processes across scales.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; design principles; feedback; fragility; planning; resilience; self-organizing; social-ecological system |
| Index terms: | complexity, built environment, self-organizing, globalization, complex system, human activity, coping, design principle, social-ecological system, becoming, planner, anthropocene |
| Subjects: | profession, philosophical process, design methods, economic factors, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental science, behavioral psychology, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, International Construction, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here