Peat, M (2009) Promotion of materials and products with sustainable credentials. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 5(1-2), pp. 46-52. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
The use of materials and products with sustainable credentials could potentially improve resource productivity and aid sustainable development. In order for such items to be widely adopted, the construction industry would need to overcome the barriers common to specification practice. The conservative nature of specifiers has been described by previous research, whereby familiar items are recurrently selected from a trusted palette and alternative solutions are only sought when the palette fails. The body of literature recognizes manufacturers as influential sources of information and has also shown that specifiers often make informal contact with companies known to them when faced with a specification problem. However, some existing work indicates that the active selection phase is not the only time when the decisions of specifiers can be influenced. Promotional material encountered during a state of passive awareness could be retained for later use, thereby expanding the specifiers' palette. This paper reports and discusses the results of a quantitative inquiry into the extent of publicity currently afforded to materials and products with sustainable credentials in mainstream construction industry periodicals. The findings reveal that problems in the marketing of these items may be acting as a barrier to their uptake by restricting the specifiers' awareness of the available options.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building product marketing; specification; sustainable materials; sustainable products |
| Index terms: | sustainable development, productivity, manufacturer, specification, promotion, construction industry, sustainable material, option, periodical, marketing |
| Subjects: | research dissemination and communication, business, sustainable materials, practitioner, decision analysis, industry analysis, management, health safety and environment, contractual condition |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Contract Administration, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here