Chiu, L F; Lowe, R; Raslan, R; Altamirano-Medina, H and Wingfield, J (2014) A socio-technical approach to post-occupancy evaluation: Interactive adaptability in domestic retrofit. Building Research & Information, 42(5), pp. 574-590. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Understanding the process of domestic retrofit is important for learning and innovation. This is particularly the case for low carbon retrofits such as those undertaken under the UK's Retrofit for the Future (RftF) programme, with its aim to achieve an overall 80% carbon reduction by 2050. Current post-occupancy evaluation (POE) research has both theoretical and methodological limitations with implications for technical and behavioural research in the built environment. Drawing on relevant ideas and concepts from social practice theory and science and technology studies, principally prefiguration (constraints/enablement), black-boxing, heating and cooling practices, this paper demonstrates how the relationship between buildings and people could be reconceptualized as mutually constitutive and co-evolving through a process of interactive adaptation. The concept of interactive adaptation is explored through a novel approach to integrating physical and social data collected from a sample of dwellings selected from the RftF programme. Analysis yields insights into the influences and pathways of interactive adaptation resulting from retrofit technology and practices. The implications of these insights for policy-makers, the research community and practitioners are discussed: end-use energy demand policy needs to be informed by a socio-technical approach.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive behaviour; heating/cooling practices; inhabitants; interactive adaptation; low carbon retrofit; postoccupancy evaluation |
| Index terms: | programme, adaptation, low carbon, post-occupancy evaluation, drawing, adaptive behaviour, science, carbon reduction, social practice theory, energy demand, socio-technical, practitioner, adaptability, built environment |
| Subjects: | specialized education, practitioner, climate science, user focus, human factors, energy systems, evaluation methods, technical documentation, theoretical framing, sustainability assessment, research methods, infrastructure and transport systems, project controls |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Education, Time Control, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here