Devine-Wright, P; Wrapson, W; Henshaw, V and Guy, S (2014) Low carbon heating and older adults: Comfort, cosiness and glow. Building Research & Information, 42(3), pp. 288-299. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Policies to decarbonize heat provision involve the diffusion of low carbon thermal technologies (e.g. ground-source heat pumps and wood pellet boilers). In domestic buildings, such efforts presume the compatibility of novel technologies with practices of home-making, in terms of comfort, cosiness and sociability. However, research on engagement with low carbon technologies post-installation is limited, particularly with older adults, a growing social group in an ageing society. This study explores how older adults living with low carbon thermal technologies represent thermal comfort, drawing on in-depth interviews in diverse UK home environments (owner-occupied and rented; extra-care, sheltered and care homes; urban and rural). Findings indicate that cosiness and glow are highly valued by and for older adults, and achieved in diverse ways that may run counter to policy goals. In owner-occupied, rural homes, wood-burning stoves were retained after installation of under-floor heating/heat pumps to provide a visible glow and hospitality to guests. In care homes, fake fireplaces provide cosiness and glow without compromising concerns about risk. The research suggests that presumed emissions savings from the deployment of low carbon heating technologies may be overestimated, as home-making practices lead to the supplementing of these devices to provide comfort, cosiness and sociability.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | elderly people; low carbon homes; low carbon society; occupant satisfaction; space heating; thermal comfort; user needs |
| Index terms: | wood, owner, drawing, savings, domestic building, low carbon, interview, low-carbon society, elderly, hospitality, care home, ageing society, comfort, space heating, heat pump, thermal comfort, occupant satisfaction, user need |
| Subjects: | sustainability assessment, traditional and composite building materials, occupational health and safety management, demography, sociology, industry analysis, environmental engineering, construction type, data collection methods, mechanical systems, user-centered design, specific urban areas and projects, technical documentation, energy systems, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here