Fawcett, T and Killip, G (2014) Anatomy of low carbon retrofits: Evidence from owner-occupied superhomes. Building Research & Information, 42(4), pp. 434-445. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
A small number of Superhome owners in the UK have renovated their homes to reduce CO2 emissions by 60% or more. Superhome owner-occupiers, their homes and various aspects of their retrofit are characterized including the timing, planning, motivation, costs and interactions with professionals, and lessons drawn from this specialized group for the wider population. Research is based on a survey of 57 Superhome owners and 14 more detailed interviews. Compared with typical owner-occupiers, Superhome owners are on average younger, better educated, living in larger household groups and larger homes, and have higher incomes. However, there is considerable variation between households. Two main routes to retrofit were identified: planned and emergent, with emergent retrofits taking longer to complete, stretching over many years in some cases. Householder levels of knowledge and involvement in planning and managing the retrofit were high. Most commonly, paid professionals did most or some of the retrofit work, but many projects included some DIY. Significantly, their decisions are not made as rational economic actors; instead motivations were multiple and included environmental concern, desire for improved comfort and living standards, reducing waste and saving on energy costs. Questions for further research are identified, as are suggestions for policy development.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | demographics; energy; homeowners; housing; low carbon; motivation; owner-occupier; refurbishment; retrofit |
| Index terms: | income, variation, CO2 emissions, homeowner, comfort, environmental concern, survey, housing, population, evidence, demographics, owner, interaction, motivation, household, low carbon, energy cost, interview |
| Subjects: | construction type, sociology, cost management, psychology, occupational health and safety management, sustainability assessment, data collection methods, contractual condition, demography, environmental issues, economic analysis, air quality, evaluation and assessment methods, behavioral psychology |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Human Resources, Urban Studies, Contract Administration, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here