On adaptive occupant-learning window blind and lighting controls

Gunay, H B; O'Brien, W; Beausoleil-Morrison, I and Huchuk, B (2014) On adaptive occupant-learning window blind and lighting controls. Building Research & Information, 42(6), pp. 739-756. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Occupants have a significant impact upon building energy use, e.g. through the actuation of window blinds and switching off lights. Automation systems with fixed set points for controlling blinds and lights have been used in some applications as an attempt to mitigate the impact of occupant behaviour upon energy consumption. A conceptual framework of an alternative control method is presented, one in which the control system adapts control set points in real time to each occupant's preferences. The potential of this hypothesis is demonstrated through a simulation-based study focused on a hypothetical south-facing office with existing empirical models that predict occupant behaviour regarding the control of window blinds and lights. The performance of a proposed adaptive automation system is simulated, one in which window-blind and lighting control set points are adapted in real time to learn the modelled occupant preferences using a Kalman filter. The performance of this alternative occupant-learning method of control is contrasted to that of two conventional control methods, one in which occupants have manual control over window blinds and lights, and the other that employs an automation system with fixed set points. The simulation results indicate that such an adaptive occupant-learning control method could lead to substantial energy savings.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: lighting; occupant behaviour; occupant learning; visual comfort; windows
Index terms: building energy use, control method, lighting control, window, energy consumption, energy-saving, real time, kalman filter, control system, conceptual framework, automation, visual comfort, preference, occupant behaviour
Subjects: project controls, environmental engineering, statistical analysis, decision-making and reasoning, architectural elements, theoretical framing, energy efficiency, monitoring and control, automation and robotics, sustainability and energy, energy systems, health behaviours and lifestyles
Topics: Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here