Senthilkumar, V and Varghese, K (2009) Structured methodology to formulate drawing dependency structure matrix for construction design. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 5(4), pp. 225-248. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Dependency structure matrix (DSM) concepts have been applied effectively to represent and manage complex design processes. However, the author's attempts to implement the concepts on large construction projects faced limitations. The key limitation was that the identification of elements for activity DSM at the appropriate level of abstraction required significant levels of expertise. As drawings are well-defined entities that are directly identifiable by the design team, this paper proposes that drawing DSM (DDSM) be used to manage the design process. Further, as drawing production is a complex task containing many subactivities, a structured method is required to identify the dependencies between the drawings. Based on a systems approach, a three-stage structured methodology to decompose the project and identify the drawing interfaces is developed. The conceptual details of this methodology are explained and the steps are illustrated using a generic example. The paper also presents the application of the methodology to an airport project and discusses the results obtained as well as the necessary future improvements.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction design management; dependency structure matrix; design interface matrix; drawing dsm; fast-track projects; interface management; physical interface matrix |
| Index terms: | large construction project, design process, design team, drawing, interface management, methodology, design management |
| Subjects: | organizational theory, design process, research methods, professional practice, technical documentation, design methods, business |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here