A greenhouse gas assessment of a stadium in Australia

Hedayati, M; Iyer-Raniga, U and Crossin, E (2014) A greenhouse gas assessment of a stadium in Australia. Building Research & Information, 42(5), pp. 602-615. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

A greenhouse gas (GHG) life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed on a stadium used for sporting events in a subtropical region in Australia. Inventories for the construction and operation of a stadium are presented and the GHG emissions from construction, operations and end-of-life waste management are assessed against the attendance of one person at one event. The inclusion of additional economic activities, patron travel, LCA methodology, attendance and stadium life-time assumptions are likely to affect the overall magnitude of the GHG emissions of one person's attendance. The assessment shows that the stadium operation accounted for 72.5% of GHG emissions, with the operation of baseload heating, ventilation and cooling, lighting and refrigeration systems dominating. The best opportunity to reduce GHG emissions is to reduce the need for the continual operation of these systems. Construction impacts account for 24.7% of impacts, while replacement materials, end-of-life management of materials are relatively insignificant, contributing to less than 3% of life cycle GHG emissions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: environmental impact assessment; greenhouse gas emissions; life cycle assessment; sporting events; stadium
Index terms: environmental impact assessment, life cycle assessment, life cycle, ventilation, Australia, inventory, economic activity, replacement, greenhouse gas, greenhouse gas emission, methodology, subtropical region, refrigeration, waste management
Subjects: air quality, mechanical systems, climate science, value management, waste management, environmental impact, materials science, economic analysis, research methods, physical geography and landforms, Geography, inventory management, environmental health
Topics: Supply Chain Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here