Hojem, T S M; Sørensen, K H and Lagesen, V A (2014) Designing a green building: Expanding ambitions through social learning. Building Research & Information, 42(5), pp. 591-601. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The process of creating a specific building-Miljøbygget in Trondheim, Norway-is analyzed in order to understand how the project team's ambitions expanded to embrace green issues and create new targets. The decisions and roles of key actors are investigated regarding these goals and criteria. The analysis draws on two concepts. First, translation theory is used to highlight the potential role of new knowledge or technology that originates outside of the project. Second, the concept of social learning is employed to understand the process of expanding ambitions, developing goals and criteria within the project, and how this is related to the collective exploration, discovery and analysis of new practices. The wider implications are considered with respect to innovation in the construction industry. The project's initial moderate energy efficiency ambition was transformed, first into stricter energy efficiency goals, then into broader environmental aims. The resulting innovation is an ambition-enhancing, experience-based and enthusiasm-driven process of social learning in the project team, marked by interpersonal trust, including trust regarding competence and contractual relations. Translation efforts were also found to be important for bringing new knowledge into the project. The conclusion discusses some policy implications.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | ambition; construction industry; design process; innovation; social learning; stakeholder motivation; sustainability; translation |
| Index terms: | motivation, Norway, social learning, design process, energy efficiency, project team, policy implication, construction industry, contractual relations, green building, competence, exploration |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, design practice, theoretical framing, contract law, Geography, personnel development, psychology, sustainability and energy, environmental resource management, project delivery, policy studies, design methods |
| Topics: | Governance, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Human Resources, Design Practice, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here