Horne, R; Maller, C and Dalton, T (2014) Low carbon, water-efficient house retrofits: An emergent niche? Building Research & Information, 42(4), pp. 539-548. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Rising carbon and water footprints of housing present a significant policy challenge across the Westernized world, and this has led to a growing range of government policies and programmes designed to promote greater residential energy and water efficiency. An analysis of low carbon/energy renovations is presented based on interviews with homeowner renovators and project managers in Australia. The renovators included self-declared green renovators and other, more typical general renovators. The project managers included a range of builders, designers, coordinators and retrofitters who provided specialized low carbon/water renovation services. Using the idea of niches and multilayer perspective (MLP), the analysis reveals both the limits to government initiatives promoting low carbon/water renovations and the importance of aspirations and relations in the low carbon/water housing renovation niche. The use of deep enquiry using semi-structured interviews reveals a detailed picture of these relations that cross the supply and demand sides of housing renovation. These relations reveal interdependence and tensions that profoundly shape low carbon/water renovations. Such relations should be explicitly accounted for in the design of government programmes and regulations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | energy efficiency; homeowners; housing; low carbon; retrofit; water; water conservation; water'energy nexus |
| Index terms: | government initiatives, builder, government policy, Australia, multilayer, residential energy, project manager, energy renovation, housing, designer, homeowner, water conservation, energy efficiency, efficiency, interview, supply and demand, interdependence, programme, renovation, low carbon, regulation |
| Subjects: | project controls, Geography, sustainability assessment, profession, specialized materials and systems, practitioner, data collection methods, market analysis, sustainability and energy, political science, construction type, sociology, organizational analysis, energy systems, occupational health, public policy, renovation and retrofit, performance management |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Construction Materials, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Time Control, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here