Ingle, A; Moezzi, M; Lutzenhiser, L and Diamond, R (2014) Better home energy audit modelling: Incorporating inhabitant behaviours. Building Research & Information, 42(4), pp. 409-421. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Building energy modelling is often used in US home energy audits to assess a home's energy performance and to determine energy-efficiency retrofit recommendations. These models promise quantitative, engineering-based, defensible information on a home's energy retrofit opportunities. Modelling is based on assumed standard use behaviours, despite highly variable energy use practices. This research reports on tests that incorporate household behaviour in home energy audit modelling, based on a sample of single-family households that received a utility-sponsored home energy audit in Seattle, Washington, a US city with a cool temperate climate. The use of a compact set of self-reported behaviours in place of standardized behavioural assumptions improved the match between actual home energy consumption and model estimates, and shifted retrofit savings predictions. These were modest improvements over the initially poor match, but highlight the opportunity for better customizing home energy audit modelling by using simple information on household behaviours. A comparison of modelled savings of heating-related conservation actions shows that energy savings from moderate behavioural changes are on par with retrofits for many homes. These steps provide a gateway to modelling household behavioural changes alongside retrofits, and a means to bring behaviour into conversations with homeowners and into the technically oriented efficiency paradigm in general.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asset models; energy; energy models; home energy audits; homeowners; housing; inhabitant behaviour; low carbon; renovation; retrofit; United States |
| Index terms: | homeowner, behavioural change, energy consumption, housing, inhabitant behaviour, energy use, energy model, Seattle, efficiency, estimate, energy modelling, energy audit, household, energy-saving, customizing, modelling, paradigm, conservation, renovation, low carbon, United States, savings, energy performance |
| Subjects: | sustainability assessment, environmental policy, Geography, demography, construction manufacturing, construction type, sociology, sustainability and energy, education and knowledge transfer, energy systems, financial and cost management, behavioral psychology, performance management, economic analysis, renovation and retrofit, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here