Housing renovations and energy efficiency: Insights from homeowners practices

Judson, E P and Maller, C (2014) Housing renovations and energy efficiency: Insights from homeowners practices. Building Research & Information, 42(4), pp. 501-511. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Renovation/retrofit is a key policy measure to reduce energy and emissions in existing residential stock. Existing approaches are typically based on assumptions about individual attitudes and technical-rational models, reliant on regulations and incentive programmes to influence homeowner behaviour. However, insufficient evaluation, together with inadequate attention given to the social dimensions of renovation, result in considerable uncertainty over the effectiveness of such policies. Drawing on ethnographic case studies informed by theories of social practice, this paper examines to what extent low energy and other environmental concerns come into play in renovations when they are conceptualized as social practices. A practice theory approach is adopted to analyze the intersection of renovations with homeowners practices. The analysis highlights the disparity between policy intentions for energy efficiency and everyday life. Findings reveal retrofit practices are mediated by the performance of practices comprising daily routines, both current and those anticipated in the future. Current policies and programmes focused on technical interventions to improve energy efficiency will have limited reach and impact. Instead, it is suggested, among other interventions, that policies to reduce the environmental impact of housing should be reframed around and positioned to address the mundane practices of everyday life.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: energy efficiency; homeowners; housing; occupant behaviour; public policy; renovation; retrofit; social practice theory
Index terms: case study, occupant behaviour, environmental concern, disparity, homeowner, housing, social practice theory, drawing, policy measure, energy efficiency, social practice, environmental impact, routine, everyday life, dimension, effectiveness, practice theory, public policy, regulation, renovation, low energy, programme
Subjects: health monitoring assessment and metrics, public policy, environmental issues, renovation and retrofit, technical documentation, social justice, performance management, environmental impact, energy systems, social theory, policy studies, theoretical framing, sustainability and energy, sociology, construction type, political science, project controls, health behaviours and lifestyles, data collection methods
Topics: Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Time Control, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Ethics, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here