Resilience and competing temporalities in cities

Moffatt, S (2014) Resilience and competing temporalities in cities. Building Research & Information, 42(2), pp. 202-220. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

How the notion of time is conceptualized can directly influence the planning, design, operation and management of cities. Resilience can be understood as an innovation in timing because it changes how people consider, value and act upon the future. Time concepts are part of a deep-rooted culturally specific sociological paradigm, and are central to society's identity and world view. To understand the scope for changing timing paradigms, an exploration is made into the historical interaction between time concepts, economic systems and built environments. Consideration is given to what kind of changes are most needed in timing, especially in light of the accelerating time preferences that can undermine long-term planning and inhibit serious discussion about the future. A new urban-based timing protocol is presented that integrates the scenario planning process by extending time horizons of the past and future, and by combining backcasting and forecasting. The new approach creates an integrated system of timing. Although many institutional barriers may frustrate adoption efforts, a number of positive opportunities are identified. These include the potential for new city-based networks to collaborate around the development and adoption of more appropriate timing tools, with support from national and international funding agencies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; cities; resilience; temporal perspectives; time; time lines; time models; urban planning
Index terms: urban planning, society, exploration, built environment, integrated system, paradigm, agency, interaction, identity, preference, forecasting, temporality, scenario planning, funding
Subjects: sociology, business, management, education and knowledge transfer, environmental resource management, economic analysis, decision-making and reasoning, communities and social development, behavioral psychology, prediction and forecasting, design methods, infrastructure and transport systems, urban planning
Topics: Governance, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here