Pivo, G (2014) Unequal access to energy efficiency in us multifamily rental housing: Opportunities to improve. Building Research & Information, 42(5), pp. 551-573. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The energy efficiency of US multifamily rental housing is compared with other housing types. A real and growing energy efficiency gap is documented, particularly for lower income households. Findings are based on data from the 2005 and 2009 US Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS). Individual energy efficiency features related to HVAC (heating, ventilation and cooling) systems, appliances, and the building envelope are analysed along with weighted and unweighted total energy efficiency indices. Multifamily units occupied by low income renters had 4.1 fewer energy efficiency features in 2005 and 4.7 fewer in 2009 compared with other households. If the number of efficiency features was on par with other housing, the savings could be in the range of US$200-400 per year for most lower-income renters in multifamily buildings. There is an astonishing lack of information on how efficiency retrofits would affect property (real estate) metrics such as cash flow and value. Available evidence suggests that millions of US properties could be good retrofit investment opportunities. Better efficiency would allow renters to increase spending on food, healthcare and other essentials. This is not only an economic issue: it has implications for household health, social equity and environmental problems tied to energy consumption.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | affordability; energy conservation; energy efficiency; energy retrofit; equity; fuel poverty; housing; housing stock; low income |
| Index terms: | ventilation, real estate, savings, energy conservation, housing stock, building envelope, survey, housing, energy efficiency gap, energy consumption, efficiency, income, energy efficiency, consumption, cash flow, household, fuel poverty, residential energy, evidence, affordability |
| Subjects: | demography, data collection methods, financial management, sustainability and energy, consumer economics, construction type, industry analysis, energy systems, evaluation and assessment methods, architectural elements, air quality, real estate economics, economic analysis, performance management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here