Short, C A; Noakes, C J; Gilkeson, C A and Fair, A (2014) Functional recovery of a resilient hospital type. Building Research & Information, 42(6), pp. 657-684. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Four adaptation options for Nightingale-type hospital ward buildings devised with practising clinicians are presented and evaluated. The adaptations recover functionality in an archaic ward configuration by delivering care to current UK National Health Service (NHS) models whilst preserving resilience to summer overheating. The investigation builds on recent work that demonstrates the significant resilience to heatwaves enjoyed by such traditionally constructed communal dormitories, the dominant UK hospital type between the late 1850s and 1939. Nightingale wards are potentially well-ventilated naturally, with good dilution of airborne pathogens. Although condemned as outdated by health ministers in recent years, many remain in use. As financial retrenchment suggests economical, creative refurbishment of hospitals will be required rather than new-build and replacement, the authors argue for health estates strategies that place value on resilience in a changing climate. Proposed adaptation options are investigated to assess resulting internal airflows and patient exposure to airborne pathogens. Options are costed and payback periods calculated to the standard public sector methodology. The proposed adaptations save time and cost over new-build equivalents. Selection of the most appropriate option is dependent on the characteristics of the patient cohort and care required.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptation; airborne infection; climate change; hospitals; overheating; refurbishment; resilience; ventilation |
| Index terms: | investigation, summer, configuration, payback, dormitory, pathogen, methodology, climate change, replacement, option, heatwave, exposure, health service, retrenchment, recovery, ventilation, public sector, adaptation, functionality, overheating, strategy |
| Subjects: | air quality, user focus, data collection methods, construction type, climate science, materials science, operations management, design features, economic analysis, research methods, public and environmental health, health risk and incident analysis, management, decision analysis, systems engineering, thermal systems, administrative law |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Design Practice, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here