Taylor, S; Fan, D and Rylatt, M (2014) Enabling urban-scale energymodelling: A new spatial approach. Building Research & Information, 42(1), pp. 4-16. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Urban-scale energy modelling provides an ideal tool for studying non-domestic energy consumption and emissions reduction at the community level. In principle, an approach based on the characteristics of individual commercial premises and buildings is attractive, but it poses a number of challenges, the most immediate of which is deciding precisely what to model. For a range of reasons connected with their self-contained nature, individual non-domestic buildings would ideally be selected. However, the main information sources available - digital mapping and business taxation data - are not based on 'buildings' and do not use the concept, thus making an automated approach problematic. At the same time, manual identification of the distinct buildings in a city is not a practical proposition because of the numbers involved. The digital mapping and business taxation data are brought together in the Local Land and Property Gazetteer (LLPG). An analysis of the relationships between the relevant elements, namely building polygons and premises attracting business taxation, allowed a unit to be defined that matches the definition of a 'building' in most circumstances and can be applied without the need for human intervention. This novel approach provides a firmer basis for modelling non-domestic building energy at the urban scale.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building stock; city scale; energy; modelling; non-domestic; spatial; urban |
| Index terms: | taxation, land, modelling, energy modelling, energy consumption, non-domestic building, building stock, mapping |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, asset management, policy economics, spatial and geospatial analysis, sustainability and energy, energy systems, real estate economics, construction type |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Regulations & Compliance, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here