Incorporating inhabitants everyday practices into domestic retrofits

Vlasova, L and Gram-Hanssen, K (2014) Incorporating inhabitants everyday practices into domestic retrofits. Building Research & Information, 42(4), pp. 512-524. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Energy-focused retrofit projects are often framed in terms of overcoming technical problems and optimizing the technical and economic performance of houses. However, this paper argues that the success of energy-focused retrofit projects (in terms of saving energy) is conditioned by their compatibility with the everyday practices of the families living afterwards in the retrofitted house. The question is whether ideas of the future everyday practices of the inhabitants are included in the planning and design of the retrofit and, if they are included, is this in order to create a material setting to accommodate environmentally preferred everyday practices? The theoretical framework of the study is founded on the crossroads between a practice-theoretical approach and a concept of design dispositions. Empirical material includes three different case studies: a do-it-yourself retrofit project; a retrofit project where idea, initiative and work are performed by professional building companies; and retrofit projects where the municipality is the main initiator of the retrofit. It is found that context-rich retrofits, in which homeowners are involved in taking decisions on the basis of technical input, are the best framing of energy retrofits. The facilitation of everyday practices (and appropriate feedback loops) can actually help to reduce consumption.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: design dispositions; energy; homeowners; housing; inhabitant behaviour; practice theory; retrofit
Index terms: practice theory, do-it-yourself, homeowner, feedback loop, municipality, consumption, framing, housing, case study, inhabitant behaviour
Subjects: control systems, theoretical framing, sociology, consumer economics, design practice, administrative law, conceptual models, construction type, data collection methods
Topics: Urban Studies, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here