Modifying the classroom environment to increase standing and reduce sitting

Aminian, S; Hinckson, E A and Stewart, T (2015) Modifying the classroom environment to increase standing and reduce sitting. Building Research & Information, 43(5), pp. 631-645. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

A reduction in sedentary behaviour (e.g. the length of time spent sitting) may prevent or reverse childhood obesity. The effectiveness of a dynamic classroom environment in increasing standing and reducing sitting time in children was determined. A controlled trial with 26 (n = 18 intervention) New Zealand children (aged 9.8 ± 0.4 years; mean ± SD) was conducted. The intervention class received height-appropriate workstations for 22 weeks while the control class retained traditional desks and chairs. Children's sitting and standing were measured at three time points (baseline, week 5, week 9). Pain, inattention and hyperactivity were also assessed. At week 22, qualitative data were collected via a focus group and an interview and analyzed using the thematic framework. Mean differences were interpreted using standardized magnitude thresholds. On weekdays (during waking hours) there was on average a large increase in overall standing, 55 minutes per day over nine weeks of intervention compared with the control classroom. Children's overall sitting time reduced, but the changes were small. There were no substantial differences between the control and intervention classrooms in pain and inattention-hyperactivity mean scores. Children enjoyed working at the height-appropriate standing workstations. Teachers were supportive of the dynamic classroom environment. Height-appropriate standing workstations can be successfully integrated into classrooms to increase overall standing and decrease sitting time.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: active design; active living; children; health; school classrooms; sitting; standing desks
Index terms: interview, classroom, pain, effectiveness, children, active design, obesity, New Zealand, school classroom, focus group, sedentary behaviour
Subjects: health behaviours and lifestyles, health conditions and diseases, Geography, construction type, demography, data collection methods, performance management, user focus
Topics: Design Practice, Construction Technology, Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here