Armitage, P; Godoy-Shimizu, D; Steemers, K and Chenvidyakarn, T (2015) Using display energy certificates to quantify public sector office energy consumption. Building Research & Information, 43(6), pp. 691-709. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The influence of internal and external characteristics on energy use in the public sector office stock in England and Wales is explored using a database of 2600 Display Energy Certificates (DECs) combined with other sources of disaggregated office information. The DEC office benchmarks are shown to match the median fossil thermal and electrical consumptions well. Analyses of heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC), size, occupancy density, building age, location and rateable value are considered. While newer offices are shown to have lower typical fossil-thermal consumption than older offices, this is counterbalanced by higher electrical consumption, resulting in higher typical CO2 emissions. This has implications for the UK's emissions reduction targets for 2050, indicating that while building regulations that focus on thermal performance have been successful, a focus on electrical consumption (both regulated and unregulated) is key. The results are also compared with existing benchmarks for all UK offices, splitting the sample into four generic types, and compared with a similar smaller study of private offices. This indicates that public offices typically used less energy than the general benchmarks had previously predicted, particularly for prestige offices.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | benchmarks; building stock; CO2 emissions; display energy certificates; energy use; non-domestic stock; offices |
| Index terms: | CO2 emissions, display energy certificate, density, building regulation, England, database, building age, public sector, ventilation, building stock, thermal performance, energy consumption, Wales, energy use, consumption |
| Subjects: | Geography, regulatory law, administrative law, asset management, data management, consumer economics, air quality, analytical methods, energy systems, sustainability and energy |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here