Evolving opportunities for providing thermal comfort

Brager, G; Zhang, H and Arens, E (2015) Evolving opportunities for providing thermal comfort. Building Research & Information, 43(3), pp. 274-287. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The building industry needs a fundamental paradigm shift in its notion of comfort, to find low-energy ways of creating more thermally dynamic and non-uniform environments that bring inhabitants pleasure. Strategies for providing enriched thermal environments must be conjoined with reducing energy; these are inseparable for any building striving for high performance. The objective of current comfort standards is to have no more than 20% of occupants dissatisfied, yet buildings are not reaching even that scant goal. A significant energy cost is incurred by the current practice of controlling buildings within a narrow range of temperatures (often over-cooling in the summer). If building designers and operators can find efficient ways to allow building temperatures to float over a wider range, while affording occupants individual control of comfort, the potential for energy savings is enormous. Five new ways of thinking, or paradigm shifts, are presented for designing or operating buildings to provide enhanced thermal experiences. They are supported by examples of research conducted by the Center for the Built Environment, and include shifts from centralized to personal control, from still to breezy air movement, from thermal neutrality to delight, from active to passive design, and from system disengagement to improved feedback loops.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptation; adaptive behaviour; air movement; buildings; energy use; personal control; solutions; thermal comfort
Index terms: strategy, personal control, adaptive behaviour, passive design, designer, adaptation, energy cost, neutrality, energy use, air movement, thermal environment, energy-saving, building industry, paradigm, feedback loop, comfort, summer, built environment, thermal comfort
Subjects: occupational health and safety management, cost management, behavioral psychology, environmental engineering, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, management, education and knowledge transfer, sustainability and energy, ethical practice, energy systems, human factors, user focus, profession, climate science, control systems
Topics: Design Practice, Urban Studies, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here