Chen, C and Messner, J I (2010) A recommended practices system for a global virtual engineering team. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 6(3), pp. 207-221. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
The use of a global virtual engineering team (GVET) for the execution of engineering projects has been increasingly applied in the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) industry, but identifying the best methods for organizing and managing these geographically dispersed teams is a significant challenge. These teams, organized through communication and information technologies, need to overcome space, time, functional, organizational, national and cultural barriers for the completion of an engineering task. This study identifies and categorizes recommended practices for GVET design and implementation by an extensive study and survey from both owner and EPC contractor perspectives. An outcome of the study is a framework for execution plan generation to establish overseas (support) offices and execute geographically distributed engineering projects. A computer application is also developed to facilitate the use of the framework and accumulate lessons learned during the use of the tool. The practices collected provide a wide range of references for owner organizations and EPC contractors to establish and manage GVET according to specific capital project scenarios.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | epc; global virtual engineering team; outsourcing; project execution plan; virtual team |
| Index terms: | virtual team, implementation, survey, execution plan, owner, information technology, lessons learned, capital project, computer application, outsourcing |
| Subjects: | software systems, strategic project management, contractual arrangements, information systems, professional development, computing systems, data collection methods, project controls, sociology, business |
| Topics: | Procurement, Time Control, Project Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here