Shifting from net-zero to net-positive energy buildings

Cole, R J and Fedoruk, L (2015) Shifting from net-zero to net-positive energy buildings. Building Research & Information, 43(1), pp. 111-120. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Numerous building projects have been presented as having net-zero energy performance. Such claims use a variety of different approaches: on- and off-site renewable energy technologies, purchasing green energy credits, etc. Efforts have subsequently been directed at formulating clear definitions of net-zero that provide some degree of clarity and theoretical framing. The emerging notion of net-positive energy buildings raises new theoretical and practical issues and introduces several new design considerations and possibilities. Net-positive energy is explored though viewing the role of a building for adding value to its context and systems in which it is part. Rather than considering only the generation of more exported energy versus its importation to individual buildings or the grid, the emphasis shifts to the maximization of energy performance in a system-based approach. Net-positive energy approaches open a host of new technical, behavioural, policy, and regulatory issues and opportunities not currently evident with net-zero energy buildings. These challenge the primacy of individual buildings as the most effective unit to make significant energy gains and the current prevalent expectation that each and every new building should be required to attain net-zero performance. More generally, it highlights the importance of extending the systems limits of energy analysis.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building assessment; buildings; built environment; energy performance; net-positive; net-zero; networks; systems
Index terms: framing, maximization, purchasing, net-zero energy building, building assessment, renewable energy, energy performance, energy analysis, built environment
Subjects: conceptual models, energy systems, algorithms, sustainable design, asset management, infrastructure and transport systems, procurement strategy, engineering analysis
Topics: Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Sustainability, Procurement, Business Strategy, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here