Performance characteristics of enhanced soil blocks: A quantitative review

Danso, H; Martinson, B; Ali, M and Mant, C (2015) Performance characteristics of enhanced soil blocks: A quantitative review. Building Research & Information, 43(2), pp. 253-262. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Several studies have focused on improving the properties of soil blocks/bricks due to perceived and real strength and durability limitations. A review of 56 published studies is presented on the effect of stabilization on the performance characteristics of soil blocks. The review found that few studies have been conducted on durability properties of enhanced soil blocks as compared with physico-mechanical properties. Fibre-enhanced soil blocks tended to have peak performance with an optimal content that achieved maximum performance. The maximum performance improvement was generally less than a doubling of the strength of the soil without the fibres. Binders showed a continual improvement with greater concentrations, so much greater improvements can be obtained if the economic and social costs can be justified. Both fibres and binders have variable performance on water absorption with both reductions and increases possible. Generally, both fibre and binder inclusion in soil blocks enhance the performance characteristics of the blocks. Binders are typically more effective on a mass-fraction basis. However the supply of fibres is usually at a lower cost and a reduced environmental impact, and therefore may have a better performance on a per-cost or per-impact basis.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bricks; building materials; earth construction; enhanced soil blocks; performance
Index terms: stabilization, performance improvement, environmental impact, building material, mechanical property, durability, water absorption
Subjects: performance measurement, water management, material properties and characteristics, building materials, economic analysis, material degradation and durability, environmental impact
Topics: Quality Management, Design Practice, Sustainability, Construction Materials, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here