Galvin, R (2015) Integrating the rebound effect: Accurate predictors for upgrading domestic heating. Building Research & Information, 43(6), pp. 710-722. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
One particular definition of the rebound effect has won acceptance for its conceptual clarity and mathematical robustness: the energy efficiency elasticity of demand for energy services. This is formulated as a partial differential, and its structure enables transformations with price and energy elasticities. However, when considering heating energy efficiency upgrades of homes, the mathematical predictions can be unreliable because these upgrades involve large changes in efficiency, energy and energy services, whereas differential calculus only holds true for very small changes. This could be one reason why existing estimates of rebound effects are so diverse. This paper shows how this limitation can be remedied, using the German housing stock as a case study. A curve of consumption/efficiency for this stock is derived from empirical studies and, based on the mathematical definition of the rebound effect, a rebound effect relation is derived from this. This curve is then integrated over the likely ranges of energy efficiency upgrades that would correspond to the government's policy of reducing consumption by 80%. The model is found to be mathematically coherent, and suggests energy service rebounds of 28-39% for the German stock as a whole if the 80% goal is achieved.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | energy efficiency elasticity; energy efficiency upgrades; Germany; housing; rebound effect; thermal retrofits |
| Index terms: | estimate, consumption, housing, energy efficiency elasticity, empirical study, Germany, thermal retrofit, housing stock, rebound effect, upgrading, transformation, efficiency, energy efficiency, case study, domestic heating |
| Subjects: | energy efficiency, research methods, performance management, Geography, industry analysis, data collection methods, strategic management, construction type, business, mechanical systems, consumer economics, sustainability and energy, energy systems, financial and cost management, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here