Exchange of relevant information in BIM objects defined by the role-and life-cycle information model

Hjelseth, E (2010) Exchange of relevant information in BIM objects defined by the role-and life-cycle information model. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 6(4), pp. 279-287. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

This article focuses on how to specify relevant information content in objects and object libraries in order to exchange relevant and reliable information in building information model (BIM)-based software. There is a general lack of professional information in BIM-based designs. The AECOO (architects, engineers, contractors, owners and operators) industry should therefore take the initiative to achieve a broad consensus about the specification of relevant information that should be standardized as content in the objects. Improved exchange of information in BIM-based software will support integrated design and delivery solutions. Objects/object libraries are proposed as the container for the exchange of information. Software objects (doors, windows, walls) and object libraries (selections of objects) with specified professional information (measurements, performance, energy, fire resistance, noise reduction, etc.) are called 'BIM objects'. The 'role-and life-cycle information model' (RIM/LIM) concept is suggested as a framework for development (specification) of relevant information in different roles and phases of a building's life cycle. A 'BIM object information standard' can be based on the RIM/LIM framework. Content in the BIM objects can be included as specifications in information delivery manuals and BIM guides.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: aecoo; BIM; information exchange; rim/lim; standardization
Index terms: specification, standardization, information exchange, window, owner, architect, life cycle, fire resistance, information delivery, engineer, noise reduction
Subjects: value management, architectural elements, data science, sociology, profession, acoustic engineering, material properties and characteristics, contractual condition, performance measurement, information systems
Topics: Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Quality Management, Project Management, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here