Huebner, G M; McMichael, M; Shipworth, D; Shipworth, M; Durand-Daubin, M and Summerfield, A J (2015) The shape of warmth: Temperature profiles in living rooms. Building Research & Information, 43(2), pp. 185-196. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The most commonly used family of models in representing the UK building stock, BREDEM (the Building Research Establishment Domestic Energy Models), assume that all homes exhibit the same heating pattern and hence can be expected to have similar temperature profiles over the course of a day. The presented research shows that homes differ significantly in their respective temperature profile over the course of the day. A cluster analysis performed on temperature data from 275 living rooms in English homes over three winter months resulted in four different clusters of temperature profiles. The clusters differ significantly in their shape, as revealed by visual inspection, and supported by significant differences in minimum and maximum temperatures and temperature variability across the day. About 40% of homes showed a bimodal temperature pattern as assumed under BREDEM. However, the remaining 60% showed very different profiles. These findings challenge the assumption that one standard pattern fits all homes. Different temperature demand profiles have important implications for future peak power demands, particularly if domestic space heating is switched to electricity. It is also helpful for relating occupant demographics to appropriate forms of fabric retrofit.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | consumption practices; heating patterns; housing; occupancy schedules; occupant behaviour; space heating demand; temperature profiles |
| Index terms: | winter, building research, visual inspection, building stock, energy model, space heating, cluster analysis, variability, occupant behaviour, housing, demographics, consumption |
| Subjects: | demography, research management, asset management, statistical analysis, construction type, mechanical systems, consumer economics, climate science, health behaviours and lifestyles, professional practice, energy systems, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here