Telling tales: Using stories to remake energy policy

Janda, K B and Topouzi, M (2015) Telling tales: Using stories to remake energy policy. Building Research & Information, 43(4), pp. 516-533. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

To benefit and protect the populace, government policies often promise aspirational changes to current practice. Different kinds of narratives are important in the framing, explanation, motivation, and understanding of policies and strategies. For example, the UK government's 2008 Climate Change Act proclaimed that all new homes will be zero carbon by 2016. This 'hero story', where society is 'saved' by clever technologies, is inspiring, positive and familiar. An alternative is the 'learning story', where things are not quite as simple as they first seemed. In a learning story, protagonists are normal people who need to overcome a challenge. In energy policy, the learning story could address the gap between the technical potential and what is achieved in practice. Three real-world examples from retrofit and new-build projects are used to show how implicit narratives can create conflict when the tellers (e.g. researchers) have to tell one kind of story but have data for the other. Recommendations are provided for a balanced approach to the deployment of different kinds of tales by policy-makers, researchers, implementers and users. Harnessing the learning story and developing a 'caring story' could motivate policy-makers and the public to invest effort in building performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; energy policy; performance gap; public policy; research challenges; retrofit; social context; storytelling
Index terms: climate change, public policy, government policy, narrative, performance gap, motivation, energy policy, framing, strategy, building performance, society
Subjects: qualitative and interpretive research, management, performance management, communities and social development, quality assurance, climate science, conceptual models, psychology, public policy
Topics: Governance, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Human Resources, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 2 CT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here