Lu, Z; Rodiek, S; Shepley, M M and Tassinary, L G (2015) Environmental influences on indoor walking behaviours of assisted living residents. Building Research & Information, 43(5), pp. 602-615. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Regular walking behaviours can improve older people's physical, psychological and social health. This project examined the relationships between assisted living facilities design features and residents indoor walking behaviours through surveys and field evaluations. Surveys were conducted in 18 assisted living facilities in the US state of Texas. Researchers gathered information from 343 residents about their walking behaviours, participation in other activities, health and demographic status, and perceptions of the environment. Field evaluations were conducted to collect objective physical environment measures. Facility information was provided by the administrators. Multivariate hierarchical regression analysis showed significant influences of physical environments on indoor walking behaviours. Indoor recreational walking was related negatively to the number of stories of the building and positively to the perception of looped corridors. Different types of utilitarian walking, such as walk to other activities, walk to front entry' and walk to mailbox' were influenced by specific design features. The number of utilitarian walking types was marginally influenced by the number of stories of the building. These findings will help inform the design of activity-friendly assisted living facilities and the creation of health promotion programmes for frail older people.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | active design; active living; assisted living; design for ageing; health; indoor environmental quality; indoor walking; older people; physical activity |
| Index terms: | health promotion, regression analysis, older people, physical activity, indoor environmental quality, active design, survey, programme |
| Subjects: | public and environmental health, project controls, demography, statistical analysis, environmental health, data collection methods, user focus, health behaviours and lifestyles |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Urban Studies, Time Control, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here