Net-zero buildings: Incorporating embodied impacts

Lützkendorf, T; Foliente, G; Balouktsi, M and Wiberg, A H (2015) Net-zero buildings: Incorporating embodied impacts. Building Research & Information, 43(1), pp. 62-81. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The design and assessment of net-zero buildings commonly focus exclusively on the operational phase, ignoring the embodied environmental impacts over the building life cycle. An analysis is presented on the consequences of integrating embodied impacts into the assessment of the environmental advantageousness of net-zero concepts. Fundamental issues needing consideration in the design process - based on the evaluation of primary energy use and related greenhouse gas emissions - are examined by comparing three net-zero building design and assessment cases: (1) no embodied impacts included, net balance limited to the operation stage only; (2) embodied impacts included but evaluated separately from the operation stage; and (3) embodied impacts included with the operation stage in a life cycle approach. A review of recent developments in research, standardization activities and design practice and the presentation of a case study of a residential building in Norway highlight the critical importance of performance indicator definitions and system boundaries. A practical checklist is presented to guide the process of incorporating embodied impacts across the building life cycle phases in net-zero design. Its implications are considered on overall environmental impact assessment of buildings. Research and development challenges, as well as recommendations for designers and other stakeholders, are identified.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; design; embodied carbon; embodied energy; environmental assessment; life cycle; net-zero
Index terms: performance indicator, building design, residential building, design practice, embodied carbon, design process, primary energy, case study, life cycle, environmental impact assessment, building life cycle, Norway, designer, standardization, research and development, greenhouse gas emission, environmental impact, environmental assessment, boundaries, embodied energy
Subjects: profession, construction type, data collection methods, environmental impact, value management, design methods, energy systems, property law, architectural design, performance measurement, performance management, Geography, design process, asset management, research management, environmental health
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here